Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Has anyone seen this girls page?  I hate her, am I being an ass?  Give me some feedback here!
fav.me/d3fhbj7
change!                                                                         Did you know that if you sell your house after 2012 you will pay a 3.8% sales tax on it?

That's $3,800 on a $100,000 home etc.

When did this happen? It's in the healthcare bill. Just thought you should know.

SALES TAX TO GO INTO EFFECT 2013 (Part of HC Bill)

REAL ESTATE SALES TAX

So, this is "change you can believe in"?
Under the new health care bill - did you know that all real estate transactions will be subject to a 3.8% Sales Tax?  The bulk of these new taxes don't kick in until 2013 (presumably after obama's re-election).  You can thank Nancy, Harry and Barack and your local Democrat Congressman for this one.  If you sell your $400,000 home, there will be a $15,200 tax.  This bill is set to screw the retiring generation who often downsize their homes.  Is this Hope & Change great or what?  Does this stuff makes your November and 2012 votes more important?
Oh, you weren't aware this was in the obamacare bill? Guess what, you aren't alone. There are more than a few members of Congress that aren't aware of it either (result of clandestine midnight voting for huge bills they've never read). AND, there are a few other surprises lurking.

Why am I sending you this?  The same reason I hope you forward this to every single person in your address book.

People have the right to know the truth because an election is coming in November!
Cuba Sees the Light, Too Bad Grijalva Hasn't

  
September 24th, 2010                           
For Immediate Release

One of the last bastions of Communism is falling.  Cuban Dictator Fidel Castro recently announced that the Cuban government would be cutting 500,000 government jobs, moving towards free-market reforms, and allowing individuals to own and operate businesses.  Yes, that's right, even Fidel Castro is abandoning socialist principles in favor of practical economic solutions.

Once again we see that socialism and its "centrally planned", big government economics simply does not work.  Except in the minds of academic theorists and populist politicians.  


In the Soviet Union, women stood in endless lines for a single loaf of bread or a pair of shoes.  North Koreans live on the edge of starvation--desperately terrified of their own government.  And Hugo Chavez rakes in billions for his cronies, while the people of Venezuela huddle in filth and abject poverty.

It doesn't work.  So why does Raul Grijalva want to replicate their failures here at home?  And if you think this is just alarmist rhetoric, ask yourself, what are the hallmarks of communist government?  


A.)   Government run and controlled healthcare?  Obamacare.  Check.

B.)   Government owns major corporations?  GM, Chrysler, Fannie, Freddie.  Check.

C.)   Government control of the financial markets?  Wall Street "Reform".  Check.

D.)   Government controlled pension and retirement system?  And it's broke.  Check.

E.)   Massive Bureaucracies?  Don't really need to say anything here.  Check.

F.)    Vast numbers of unionized government employees?  And they make double what they would in the private sector.  Check

G.)   Wealth Redistribution?  Tax hikes for small business owners.  Check


"Communist countries have always been big on promises and short on their deliveries.  The 'Radiant Future' of Karl Marx has never been more than a mirage," said Ruth McClung.  "But some politicians--like our President and Mr. Grijalva--still believe in the fantasy.   But that's all socialism is, a fantasy.  They're grasping for something that doesn't exist--like a dying man in the desert, they think that dust cloud ahead is a palm grove with a pool of icy cold water in the middle."



"The only way to solve our problems and lead America back into the future is to embrace the free market, personal responsibility and self reliance."



Contact:                             
Sam Stone, Media Relations                                                                    Ruth McClung for Congress
520-822-7162                                                                                                                       520-579-5734

sam.g.stone@gmail.com                                                                                       Ruth McClung
  

Ruth McClung for Congress | PO Box 40544 | Tucson | AZ | 85717
Date:  Wednesday, September 22, 2010 8:07 AM  
    
Subject:  Hillary Clinton commits to UN Small Arms Treaty  


Dear fellow patriot,

With willing one-world accomplices in Washington, D.C., gun-grabbers around the globe believe they have it made.

In fact, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton just announced the Obama Administration would be working hand in glove with the UN to pass a new “Small Arms Treaty.”

This is Congressman Paul Broun from Georgia.

I’m writing you to make sure American citizens are prepared to oppose this assault on our national sovereignty and right to keep and bear arms.

Disguised as legislation to help in the fight against “terrorism,” “insurgency” and “international crime syndicates,” the UN’s Small Arms Treaty is nothing more than a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme.

Ultimately, the UN’s Small Arms Treaty is designed to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private citizens like YOU.

The National Association for Gun Rights has a Firearms Sovereignty Survey ready for you to complete, but I want you to understand just how dangerous this global gun ban is.  Please bear with me for a moment.

So far, the gun-grabbers have successfully kept the exact wording of their new scheme under wraps.

But looking at previous versions of the UN “Small Arms Treaty,” you and I can get a good idea of what’s likely in the works.

If passed by the UN and ratified by the U.S. Senate, the UN “Small Arms Treaty” would almost certainly FORCE national governments to:


*** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding citizens cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;


*** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL “unauthorized” civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);


*** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;


*** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.


I'm sure I don't have to tell you that this is NOT a fight we can afford to lose.

Ever since its founding almost 65 years ago, the United Nations has been hell-bent on bringing the United States to its knees.

To the petty dictators and one-worlders who control the UN, the U.S. isn’t a “shining city on a hill” -- it’s an affront to their grand totalitarian designs for the globe.

These anti-gun globalists know that so long as Americans remain free to make our own decisions without being bossed around by big government bureaucrats, they’ll NEVER be able to seize the worldwide oppressive power they crave.

And the UN’s apologists also know the most effective way to finally strip you and me of ALL our freedoms would be to DESTROY our gun rights.

That’s why I’ve decided to stand with the National Association for Gun Rights in their opposition to this assault on our Constitution!

The truth is, there’s no time to waste.

You and I have to be prepared for this fight to move FAST.

The fact is, the last thing the gun-grabbers in the U.N. and in Washington, D.C., want is for you and me to have time to react and mobilize gun owners to defeat this radical legislation.

They’ve made that mistake before, and we’ve made them pay, defeating EVERY attempt to ram the “Treaty on Small Arms” into law since the mid-1990s.

But this time, time won’t be on our side.

In fact, we’re likely to only have a few days or weeks to defeat the treaty.

Worse, there’s no longer a pro-gun Senate to kill ratification of the treaty.

There’s no longer a President in the White House who has stated opposition to the treaty.

And you and I know good and well how Germany, Great Britain, France, Communist China or the rest of the anti-gun members of the United Nations are going to vote.

So our ONE AND ONLY CHANCE of stopping the UN’s “Small Arms Treaty” is during the ratification process in the U.S. Senate.

As you know, it takes 67 Senate votes to ratify a treaty.

So rounding up 34 votes to kill this thing should be easy, right?

Unfortunately, that couldn’t be further from the truth.

First, you know just as well as I do how few Senators are truly “pro-gun.”

Second, even with the partisan rancor in Washington, D.C., many Senators get “queasy” about killing treaties for fear of “embarrassing” the President -- especially with “international prestige” at stake.

They look at ratifying treaties much like approving Presidents’ Supreme Court nominees.

And remember how many Senators turned their back on us and voted to confirm anti-gun Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor?

A dozen more only voted against Sotomayor after receiving massive grassroots pressure from the folks back home.

So if we’re going to defeat the UN’s “Small Arms Treaty” we have to turn the heat up on the U.S. Senate now before it’s too late!

Do you believe the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Second Amendment are the supreme law of the land?

Do you believe any attempt by the United Nations to subvert or supersede your Constitutional rights must be opposed?

If you said “Yes” to these questions, please sign the survey the National Association for Gun Rights has prepared for you.

Your survey will put you squarely on the record AGAINST the UN’s Small Arms Treaty.

Along with your signed survey, I hope you’ll send a generous contribution of $250, $100, $50 or $35 to help finance this battle.

With your generous contribution, the National Association for Gun Rights will immediately begin contacting Second Amendment supporters to turn up the heat on targeted U.S. Senators.

Direct mail.  Phones.  E-mail.  Blogs. Billboards.  Guest editorials. Press conferences.  Hard-hitting newspaper, radio and TV ads.  The whole nine yards.

Of course, if NAGR can raise enough resources, their goal is to expand this full program to ALL their target states.

But that’s not going to be cheap, and we may not have much time.

In fact, if we’re going to defeat the UN’s so-called “Small Arms Treaty,” we have to start NOW!

So please put yourself on record AGAINST the UN’s “Small Arms Treaty” by signing NAGR’s Firearms Sovereignty Survey.

And if you possibly can, please agree to make a contribution of $250, $100, $50 or $35.

Every dollar counts in this fight.

Thank you in advance for contributing you time and money towards defending our Second Amendment rights.

For Freedom,

Dr. Paul Broun, M.D.
U.S. Congressman (R-GA)


P.S. The Obama Administration just announced they would be working hand in glove with the UN to pass a new GLOBAL, “Small Arms Treaty.”

That’s why its vital you and I fight back IMMEDIATELY.

Please return your Firearms Sovereignty Survey and put yourself squarely on the record AGAINST ratification of the UN’s Small Arms Treaty

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For Information about Advertising, Click Here

visiontoamerica.org - A Division of Christian Worldview Communications, LLC
Amid the ongoing controversy surrounding the planned mosque near New York's ground zero comes the disclosure that American taxpayers are funding the construction and renovation of mosques around the world.

The State Department's U.S. Ambassadors Fund for cultural preservation (AFCP) is spending millions of dollars on at least 29 mosque-related projects in 18 countries, including, Pakistan, Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, Sudan, and Albania.

State Department spokeswoman Nicole Thompson told the Daily Caller website that the AFCP is a type of "diplomatic effort and outreach."

The State Department recently provided Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana, Ranking Republican the Committee on Foreign Relation, with a document explaining that the funding of mosques was given a green light in 2003. at that time the Justice Department said the constitution did not bar federal funds to preserve religious structures if they had cultural significance.

But Robert Spencer, director of Jhad Watch, told the Daily Caller that funding mosque renovation and rehabilitation is disastrously wrongheaded and unconstitutional. They are not going to win hearts and minds. It is not as if they are going to say, the Americans built this mosque for us so we shouldn't wage jihad on them.

He added a mosque is a mosque is a mosque. it is where prayers happen. that is a religious installation.

And Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, president and founder of the American islamic Forum for Democracy. said "We have always felt this type of outreach is completely inefective and that ultimately we have to approach it like the Cold War where we are fighting an ideology."

If we are going to have this long war of ideas we cannot fund these religious Instituions. we can fund anti-Islamist institutions based in liberty.

webmail.west.cox.net/do/mail/m…

Recent Journal Entries

Journal Writers

No bloggers yet.